Skip to content
  • About
    • About the project
    • Guidance
  • Climate Disinformation
    • Modules
    • Disinformation Narratives
    • Bi-annual reports
  • Media Literacy
    • Modules
    • Articles
    • Graphics & Videos
    • External Material
  • Resources
  • About
    • About the project
    • Guidance
  • Climate Disinformation
    • Modules
    • Disinformation Narratives
    • Bi-annual reports
  • Media Literacy
    • Modules
    • Articles
    • Graphics & Videos
    • External Material
  • Resources
  • About the project
  • Climate Disinformation
  • Modules
  • Contact
  • About the project
  • Climate Disinformation
  • Modules
  • Contact
  • About
    • About the project
    • Guidance
  • Climate Disinformation
    • Modules
    • Disinformation Narratives
    • Bi-annual reports
  • Media Literacy
    • Modules
    • Articles
    • Graphics & Videos
    • External Material
  • Resources
  • About
    • About the project
    • Guidance
  • Climate Disinformation
    • Modules
    • Disinformation Narratives
    • Bi-annual reports
  • Media Literacy
    • Modules
    • Articles
    • Graphics & Videos
    • External Material
  • Resources
Search
  • Home
  • All Courses
  • Media Literacy

Critical Thinking Skills / Fallacies

Curriculum

  • 5 Sections
  • 28 Lessons
  • 25 Minutes
Expand all sectionsCollapse all sections
  • Introduction
    1
    • 1.1
      Introduction
  • Learning objectives
    1
    • 2.1
      Learning objectives
  • Fallacy literacy training
    15
    • 3.1
      Fallacy literacy training 1/15
    • 3.2
      Fallacy literacy training 2/15
    • 3.3
      Fallacy literacy training 3/15
    • 3.4
      Fallacy literacy training 4/15
    • 3.5
      Fallacy literacy training 5/15
    • 3.6
      Fallacy literacy training 6/15
    • 3.7
      Fallacy literacy training 7/15
    • 3.8
      Fallacy literacy training 8/15
    • 3.9
      Fallacy literacy training 9/15
    • 3.10
      Fallacy literacy training 10/15
    • 3.11
      Fallacy literacy training 11/15
    • 3.12
      Fallacy literacy training 12/15
    • 3.13
      Fallacy literacy training 13/15
    • 3.14
      Fallacy literacy training 14/15
    • 3.15
      Fallacy literacy training 15/15
  • Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook
    11
    • 4.1
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 1/10
    • 4.2
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 2/10
    • 4.3
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 3/10
    • 4.4
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 4/10
    • 4.5
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 5/10
    • 4.6
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 6/10
    • 4.7
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 7/10
    • 4.8
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 8/10
    • 4.9
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 9/10
    • 4.10
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook 10/10
    • 4.11
      Critical thinking skills: The 5 techniques of sciences denial by John Cook Quiz
      7 Questions
  • Resources
    1
    • 5.1
      Resources

Fallacy literacy training 7/15

Example of a failed argument

“I just saw a documentary about Egypt and they say that 4000 years ago there was a drought that lasted 150 years and caused the death of many, many people and animals. As far as we can see, ‘climate change’ is cyclical and has always existed”.

Let’s think about this statement:

Try to put your beliefs aside and let’s focus on how the conclusion relates to the evidence provided:

  1. Why do you think the evidence is strong, or what kind of weakness do you find?
  2. Regarding the conclusion: “‘Climate change’ is cyclical and has always existed”. What kind of evidence or how much evidence do you think is necessary to confirm or deny this conclusion?
  3. Identify the evidence in the argument. Is this relevant, sufficient, necessary and supported by scientific studies?
  4. After this analysis: Do you think this is a good argument or a fallacy? Come up with a brainstorm. Why is it a good argument? Why is it a fallacy?
Fallacy literacy training 6/15
Prev
Fallacy literacy training 8/15
Next

coordinated by

CMCC – Fondazione Centro Euro – Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici

Via Marco Biagi 5 – 73100 Lecce, Italy
Tel: +39 0832 1902411
© 2024 Agora. All rights reserved
Facebook X-twitter Linkedin Youtube Envelope

coordinated by

CMCC – Fondazione Centro Euro – Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici

Via Marco Biagi 5 – 73100 Lecce, Italy
Tel: +39 0832 1902411
© 2024 Adaptation AGORA. All rights reserved
Facebook X-twitter Linkedin Youtube Envelope

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Declaration

Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Declaration